Sobre la importancia de la visibilidad (y temas relacionados)
A. Casadevall and J. Handelsman, The presence of
female conveners correlates with a higher proportion of female
speakers at scientific symposia, mBio 5 (2014), no. 1, e00846-13.
T. A. DiPrete and G.M. Eirich, Cumulative
advantage as a mechanism for inequality: a review of theoretical
and empirical developments, Annual Review of Sociology 32 (2006),
A. H. Eagly and S. J. Karau, Role congruity
theory of prejudice toward female leaders, Psychological Review 109
(2002), no. 3, 573–598.
E. Ries and S. Milstein, Seeking speakers,
Startup Lessons Learned, August 8, 2012. Link
M. E. Heilman, M. C. Simon, and D. P. Repper,
Intentionally favored, unintentionally harmed? impact of sexbased
preferential selection on self-perceptions and self-evaluations,
Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (1987), no. 1, 62–68.
Sobre acciones institucionales en pro de la diversidad en la
B. L. Keyfitz et al. , Women mathematicians in
the academic ranks: a call to action, BIRS Workshop on Women in
Mathematics (September 2006), final report. Link
A. Prasad, Conference diversity distribution
E. Ries, Why diversity matters (the meritocracy
business), Startup Lessons Learned, February 22, 2010. Link
C. Stanton, How I got 50% women speakers at my
tech conference, Geek Feminism, May 21, 2012. Link
R. E. Steinpreis, K. A. Anders, and D. Ritzke,
The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job
applicants and tenure candidates: a national empirical study, Sex
Roles 41 (1999), no. 7/8, 509–528.
V. Valian, D. Sperber, et al., For gender
equality at academic conferences. Link
V. Valian, Recruitment and retention: guidelines
for chairs, heads, and deans, The Gender Equity Project, Hunter
College, City University of New York, updated February 2011. Link
(accessed November 17, 2014)
Feministe, Female conference speaker bingo: a
bingo card full of excuses for not having more female speakers at
STEM conferences. Link
JSConf EU 2012, Beating the odds—how we got 25%
women speakers for JSConf EU 2012. Link
Sociedad Matemática Mexicana: Recomendaciones
para la adecuada participación de grupos con baja representación en
congresos de matemáticas. Link
WISELI, online brochures and booklets, Women in
Science & Engineering Leadership Institute (Madison). Advancing
women in science and engineering: advice to the top, Link
; Benefits and challenges of diversity in academic settings, Link
; Fostering success for women in science and engineering, Link
; Reviewing applicants: research on bias and assumptions, Link
. Accessed July 28, 2014.
WISELI, Searching for Excellence & Diversity: A
guide for search committees, Women in Science & Engineering
Leadership Institute (Madison), 2012.
Sobre diversidad y ciencia (y temas relacionados)
J. Surowiecki, The difference difference makes:
waggle dances, the Bay of Pigs, and the value of diversity, in The
Wisdom of Crowds, Doubleday, 2004, 23–39.
N. D. Tyson, response to question during panel
discussion, The Secular Society and its Enemies, Center for
Inquiry, New York, 2007. response Link ;
conference web site Link
E. L. Uhlmann and G. L. Cohen, “’I think it,
therefore it’s true’: effects of self-perceived objectivity on
hiring discrimination”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes 104 (2007), 207–223.
D. H. Uttal, Beliefs about genetic influences on
mathematics achievement: A cross-cultural comparison,Genetica 99
K. Wellhousen, Do’s and don’ts for eliminating
hidden bias, Childhood Education 73 (1996), no. 1, 36–39.
C. Wenneras and A. Wold, Nepotism and sexism in
peer-review, Nature 387 (1997), 341–343.
Women in Number Theory, Female Number Theorists. Link
Sobre género y ciencia.
C. Good, A. Rattan, and C. S. Dweck, Why do women
opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation of
mathematics, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102
(2012), no. 4, 700–717.
N. M. Else-Quest, J. S. Hyde, and M. C. Linn,
Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a
meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin 136 (2010), n o. 1, 103–127.
B. A. Barres, Does gender matter? Nature 442
Feminist Philosophers, Gendered conference
campaign, initial version December 9, 2009. Link
L. Guiso, F. Monte, P. Sapienza, and L. Zingales,
Culture, gender, and math, Science 320 (2008), 1164–1165.
M. E. Heilman, A. S. Wallen, D. Fuchs, and M. M.
Tamkins, Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at
male gender-typed tasks, Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (2004),
no. 3, 416–427.
J. S. Hyde and J. E. Mertz, Gender, culture, and
mathematics performance, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 106 (2009),
J. M. Kane and J. E. Mertz, Debunking myths about
gender and mathematics performance, Notices of the AMS 59 (2012),
no. 1, 10–21.
G. Martin, An annotated bibliography of work
related to gender in science. Link
G. Martin, Addressing the underrepresentation of
women in mathematics conferences. Link
E. Pronin, T. Gilovich, and L. Ross, Objectivity
in the eye of the beholder: perceptions of bias in self versus
others, Psychological Review 111 (2004), 781–799.
E. Reuben, P. Sapienza, and L. Zingales, How
stereotypes impair women’s careers in science, Proceedings of the
National Academy of Science of the USA 111 (2014), no. 12,
C. L. Ridgeway, Gender, status, and leadership,
Journal of Social Issues 57 (2001), no. 4, 637–655.
C. L. Ridgeway and S. J. Correll, Unpacking the
gender system: a theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and
social relations, Gender and Society 18 (2004), no. 4, 510–531.
L. Sinclair and Z. Kunda, Motivated stereotyping
of women: she’s fine if she praised me but incompetent if she
criticized me, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25
(2000), no. 11, 1329–1342.
K. Snyder, The abrasiveness trap: high-achieving
men and women are described differently in reviews, Fortune.com,
August 26, 2014. Link
S. J. Spencer, C. M. Steele, and D. M. Quinn,
Stereotype threat and women’s math performance, Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology 35 (1999), 4–28.